Reshaping business and the world by leveraging knowledge intangibles
Feb, 2012: Combinatoric Innovation and Sharing Hidden Know-How
Here are the slides from our two presenters:
Paul Iske Professor of Combinatoric Innovation: Leveraging the IC of different parties at Maastricht University.
He will be speaking about A New Business Model: If we knew what we are doing, we wouldn't call it innovation. In this presentation, we will discuss how paradigm shifts are related to radical innovation and how 'combinatoric innovation' can be supported by creating the right environment. In such an environment, serendipity is key and failure is an option!
Katrina Pugh author of Sharing Hidden Know-How
She will be speaking about How to Channel Insight into Action Productivity grows, mergers flourish, and innovations spread when we use conversation to systematically elicit the hidden know-how in our individuals and teams."
Views: 34
- Attachments:
-
-
2012-02 Iske.pdf, 1.7 MB -
2012-02 Pugh.pdf, 1.4 MB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Mary Adams on
-
The comment stream first from Paul's talk and then from Kate's talk:
Thomas Mathiasen: We are creative people and can manage chaos
Katrina Pugh: This topic is a perfect segue to my talk
jay chatzkel: For my talk next month as well
Xiaomi An: Very good point on communication of knowledge is critical for successful application of knowledge, which has important impact on innovation, the process of knowledge transfer.
Bill Miller: iterative process of discovery of the problem and the solution
SABETZADEH Farzad (privately): It's fine now, Mary
Bill Miller: customers and suppliers
Xiaomi An: Strategic overview, meta-synthetic view
Bill Miller: the plan is to replan after discovery
Xiaomi An: people (views), process (workflow), technology (system) with novelty and usefulness
Bill Miller: great space!
Peter Heisig: process should not be equalise to workflow. this is very misleading!
Xiaomi An: meta-synthetic conference hall and web.2.0 social media, social networks, sharepoint enablers support
Xiaomi An: Thanks. process-procedure/activity
Bill Miller: how do you test the ideas with real users who are potential customers?
Xiaomi An: what is the difference between creativity and innovation?
Constantinos Stavropoulos: "Prepare-Recognize-Seize-Amplify" serendipity patterns - see http://bponline.amcham.gr/?p=1082 , artcile posted by Constantinos
Peter Heisig: What do you mean with "open environment"? Is it physical space?
Thomas Mathiasen: I like the idea of brilliant mistakes. We once at Novo Nordisk measured where new products came from - 50% were developed from mistakes from other projects that had "failed"
Bill Miller: thanks
Constantinos Stavropoulos: Can you provide tips on grasping "effective surprises"?
Thomas Mathiasen: I agree. Thanks
Thomas Mathiasen: How do you convince an organisation to o for this organised serendipity?
Xiaomi An: exploration and exploitation
Peter Spence: Open innovation obviously requires people to cross boundaries (diversity) - how do you prepare/support people to cross boundaries?
Thomas Mathiasen: Thanks Paul.
Mary Adams: Thanks Paul!
Xiaomi An: Thanks paul!
Gordon McConnachie: YES
Mary Adams: Remember that we can have more conversations on line at the ICKC
Constantinos Stavropoulos: thank you Paul
jay chatzkel: In his book Change by Design, Tim Brown discusses how to combine methodologies for "design thinking" so that participants se the world differently, listen differently and collaborate more productively,. One major element is prototyping. Very good for their process and great examples.
Mary Adams: The slides are there too.
Peter Spence: Thanks Paul
Peter Heisig: Paul, thank you very much,
Bill Miller: how do you handle minority opinions vs. majority opinions?
Peter Heisig: Could you elaborate on your $17m claim?
Mary Adams (privately): No problem.
Mary Adams (privately): At the end, I just need a minute to copy the comment stream. I also want to check Gordon's microphone.
Bill Miller: debono 6 thinking hats?
Thomas Mathiasen: I like your process of getting the knowledge and ideas forward through the facilitated process. We have a process for doing that for B2B conversations - but not as focused on the hidded knowledge as you do.
Thomas Mathiasen: So, could this process be understood as a way of getting the potential value in the tacit knowledge brought to live?
Xiaomi An: Is your knowledge jam belonging to a types of knowledge transferring methods?
Peter Heisig: What is different to the classical "knowledge broker" who facilitates workshops with the right 'experts'?
Deborah Cooper: How are business people managing the shift from intellectual property as horded knowledge versus information sharing as value-added knowledge?
Deborah Cooper: (hoarded, rather)
Peter Heisig: Thanks, this is why I put experts in brackets. What the the time effort to spent on this?
Peter Spence: Does the collaborative competency of an organisation feature in your approach to knowledge sharing and co-creation?
Xiaomi An: Thanks.
Xiaomi An: It is difficulty to translate the knowledge jam into Chinese, though I see your point. I wish you could provide us a definition for it. Thanks.
Xiaomi An: Thanks.
Peter Spence: Well worth waiting up for Katrina, thankyou
Constantinos Stavropoulos: thank you Katrina
Xiaomi An: Many thanks Kate.
Gordon McConnachie: Two excellent presentations
Constantinos Stavropoulos (privately): Thank you Mary. Sorry, have to leave. Best! Constantinos
Xiaomi An: Thanks Mary for the excellent event, thanks for the speakers for sharing the knowledge and experiences.
Peter Heisig: Thank you very much!
Gordon McConnachie: Now re-connected again
Peter Spence: Once again, many thanks for the presentations and organisation - it all worked out in the end
Thomas Mathiasen: Good presentations, thx
Mary Adams: Thanks to everyone!!
-
© 2012 Created by Mary Adams.
